If anyone sees problems with any of my descriptions, let me know. Most of it is lifted from the wiki, but I'm not even gonna lie, the wiki does contradict itself several times, I tried to explain it as best as I could.
Also, the options might need some changing, in my experience, these were the most common that came up.
taggin-dragon said:
I think some other dragon types ought to be added (ex: mechanical dragon, goo dragon, dragon humanoid)
I filtered out dragon_humanoid specifically as it has its own entire set of tags that would need to be applied - scalie_humanoid or furred_dragon_humanoid or feathered_dragon_humanoid and so on. That would probably be better suited to a different project entirely.
what part of the pussy are we coloring here, the labia majora? minora? what if the vagina is just a slit (not talking about the lizard type slit here) and the surrounding is the same color as the character's body?
scaliespe said:
Why does the "No nipples" option add digitigrade? And why does the search exclude digitigrade? Non-mammals can be either digitigrade or plantigrade (or other...), and that has nothing to do with nipples. It's a foot/leg shape.
It would also be a good idea to add either featureless_chest or featureless_breasts to the No nipples option - or rather have two separate options that add either of those two.
Anguirus12345 said:
scaliespe said:
Why does the "No nipples" option add digitigrade? And why does the search exclude digitigrade? Non-mammals can be either digitigrade or plantigrade (or other...), and that has nothing to do with nipples. It's a foot/leg shape.
It would also be a good idea to add either featureless_chest or featureless_breasts to the No nipples option - or rather have two separate options that add either of those two.
I made a small mistake, it wasn't supposed to be "digitigrade" it was supposed to be "featureless_breasts" I confuse the tags
scaliespe said:
Why does the "No nipples" option add digitigrade? And why does the search exclude digitigrade? Non-mammals can be either digitigrade or plantigrade (or other...), and that has nothing to do with nipples. It's a foot/leg shape.
It would also be a good idea to add either featureless_chest or featureless_breasts to the No nipples option - or rather have two separate options that add either of those two.
I made a small mistake, it wasn't supposed to be "digitigrade" it was supposed to be "featureless_breasts" I confuse the tags
Why does the "No nipples" option add digitigrade? And why does the search exclude digitigrade? Non-mammals can be either digitigrade or plantigrade (or other...), and that has nothing to do with nipples. It's a foot/leg shape.
It would also be a good idea to add either featureless_chest or featureless_breasts to the No nipples option - or rather have two separate options that add either of those two.
It might be good at add -penetrable_sex_toy since things like fleshlights are still sex toys, but they are not designed to penetrate, so they're pretty much irrelevant to this tag project.
bitWolfy said:
This is not a great project.
You are not supposed to just remove invalid tags. You should look at the image itself, and replace the invalid tags with whatever the original tagger meant.
i.e. replace red with red_fur.
I've been adding them manually when it's applicable.
This is not a great project.
You are not supposed to just remove invalid tags. You should look at the image itself, and replace the invalid tags with whatever the original tagger meant.
You are required to fill this out because unlisted projects are still available via a direct link.
And a link to the project is included in the description of every edit you make using this tool.
If you can't even be bothered to write a single sentence summarizing a project, then what are you even doing here?
I've definitely tagged characters who are on their hands and knees, but have one limb lifted as all_fours. I personally wouldn't worry about tagging unknown position and would just skip to the next one.
if a character is making several posed use [[multiple_poses]]. for different sex positions use [[multiple_positions]]. review post {{2455445}} -- If a character is almost on {{all_fours}} with one limb lifted?
It would be helpful to have the wiki descriptions in the tagging guidelines I, and likely many others, have a hard time remembering things like the difference between muscular and athletic.
bitWolfy said:
6_legs and such (there are tags for 1_leg, 2_legs, 3_legs, etc) are actually a part of the [multi-leg] (https://e621.net/wiki_pages/6616) tag group - characters with more legs than they are supposed to have.
hmm, good to know. That tag group seems directly counter to twys.
tittybitty said:
Are the tags like hexapod preferred over the more common 6_legs, format?
6_legs and such (there are tags for 1_leg, 2_legs, 3_legs, etc) are actually a part of the multi-leg tag group - characters with more legs than they are supposed to have.
A lot of the posts tagged with 6_legs are in reality just improperly tagged.
I personally don't think that tag group should even exist, but I was overruled on that one.
The tags included in this project are for the "natural" number of legs.
I re-read the all_fours wiki and realized it only said that all_fours didn't need to be tagged on quadrupeds, not that it shouldn't be. So the tagging done by this project isn't problematic, but it was largely unnecessary.
I began this project to fill in tags related to money. I later reused the project to tag missing character genders. I have done my best to restore the original query and tag options. As best I can tell this state represents between 2/3rds and 3/4ths of the changes made under the project.
Please, do not reuse existing projects for a new purpose.
This creates confusion in the list of changes, as the list of changes now has one project making different sets of changes.
Hm. There's so many possible *_humanoid tags to be removed that this project doesn't quite work. Even with just the common ones, the list ends up so long that the image itself is barely visible...
Yeah, taur is extremely rare for pokemon. None of the pokemon are normally taur, but they do occasionally get drawn as taurified. It's so rare that it probably doesn't need a button, but it's good to filter them out.
Which reminds me, there's also the sphere_creature category, though the only canon pokemon that belong in that body type are Voltorb and Electrode.
Yellow gloves is tagged "yellow_yellow" instead of "yellow_gloves"!
needs an option to remove tongue from posts that don't have a visible tongue.
It is possible for two characters to appear both nude, clothed and barefoot simultaneously
I would add -solo and -solo_focus to the tags to avoid posts like these
https://tagme.dev/projects/simult_oral/resolve/4449583 https://tagme.dev/projects/simult_oral/resolve/4616940
Well, now every dragon is a scalie....
Is the general consensus that inside_vehicle counts as inside? If so, I'll have that option add inside as well.
there also appears to be "grey_yoshi" which isnt included in the minus tags. maybe that counts as "black_yoshi"?
secret test comment :3
Might be an idea to remove the fox tag when selecting the grey_fox tag, since they belong to a diferent genus entirely.
It would be helpful to add young_ambiguous to fill the last slot, especially since young characters are more likely to be ambiguous than adults.
The apostrophe in the tag string is incorrect.
If anyone sees problems with any of my descriptions, let me know. Most of it is lifted from the wiki, but I'm not even gonna lie, the wiki does contradict itself several times, I tried to explain it as best as I could.
Also, the options might need some changing, in my experience, these were the most common that came up.
I filtered out dragon_humanoid specifically as it has its own entire set of tags that would need to be applied - scalie_humanoid or furred_dragon_humanoid or feathered_dragon_humanoid and so on. That would probably be better suited to a different project entirely.
The other two are very niche tags, but perhaps.
I think some other dragon types ought to be added (ex: mechanical dragon, goo dragon, dragon humanoid)
Site isn't working for me :(
How about a "partially_exposed_diaper" tag? For instances like #3696482 ; #3724480 ; and specially #3507670
how about removing halfbody, headshot, & bust portraits from the search?
Other useful tags:
penis_backwards
penis_tuck
-balls
Some extra tags to keep in mind:
back_boob
bandeau
bikini_top
bra
camisole
chest_wraps
clothed
corset
crop_top
dress
shirt
side_boob
sleeveless shirt
sports_bra
tank_top
tube_top
under_boob
Onomatopoeia too?
Made a more detailed version of this here https://tagme.dev/projects/penis_features
Sorry it took me 4 months but it's done now. I wanted to add simply just [[water]] too but I hit the max of 10 options.
cervine_penis (deer, moose, elk) equine_penis (horse, zebra, donkey) feline_penis (cats) cetacean_penis (dolphin, whale, orca) ridged_penis/(ribbed_penis (smoother))(dragons, mythical creatures) spiral_penis (pigs, ducks) bovine_penis (cattle, bison, buffalo) ursine_penis (bears)
These are the most commons on e621. But there are several more
what part of the pussy are we coloring here, the labia majora? minora? what if the vagina is just a slit (not talking about the lizard type slit here) and the surrounding is the same color as the character's body?
Okay, is already corrected.
I made a small mistake, it wasn't supposed to be "digitigrade" it was supposed to be "featureless_breasts" I confuse the tags
Why does the "No nipples" option add digitigrade? And why does the search exclude digitigrade? Non-mammals can be either digitigrade or plantigrade (or other...), and that has nothing to do with nipples. It's a foot/leg shape.
It would also be a good idea to add either featureless_chest or featureless_breasts to the No nipples option - or rather have two separate options that add either of those two.
I'd like to suggest adding pond, river, and hot_spring to the options, as these seem to come up fairly often.
It might be good at add -penetrable_sex_toy since things like fleshlights are still sex toys, but they are not designed to penetrate, so they're pretty much irrelevant to this tag project.
I've been adding them manually when it's applicable.
This is not a great project. You are not supposed to just remove invalid tags. You should look at the image itself, and replace the invalid tags with whatever the original tagger meant.
i.e. replace
redwithred_fur.Just edit the project, and set it to public.
Edit: Just realized that the project is edit-locked 🤦♂️
I'll un-unlist it for you.
Is there a way to un-unlist a project? I don't remember why I had this unlisted and don't think there's a reason to keep it this way.
You are required to fill this out because unlisted projects are still available via a direct link. And a link to the project is included in the description of every edit you make using this tool.
If you can't even be bothered to write a single sentence summarizing a project, then what are you even doing here?
This was my first try at making a project. I removed it after making all the pier/dock edits manually.
https://e621.net/tags?commit=Search&search%5Bhide_empty%5D=yes&search%5Bname_matches%5D=%2A_masturbation&search%5Border%5D=count more than just that
I've definitely tagged characters who are on their hands and knees, but have one limb lifted as all_fours. I personally wouldn't worry about tagging unknown position and would just skip to the next one.
In fact, I just posted an image and forgot to add that tag, thanks for reminding me
Change log:
patreontag means.if a character is making several posed use [[multiple_poses]]. for different sex positions use [[multiple_positions]]. review post {{2455445}} -- If a character is almost on {{all_fours}} with one limb lifted?
also see https://e621.net/wiki_pages/4612
I will tag 'unknown_position` on the ones I am unsure on
Can you please add -not_furry to the search?
It would be helpful to have the wiki descriptions in the tagging guidelines I, and likely many others, have a hard time remembering things like the difference between muscular and athletic.
hmm, good to know. That tag group seems directly counter to twys.
Changed my mind and switched out carrying for straddling.
added a ~anthro ~human ~humanoid ~biped condition to restrict image set to bipeds. Then replaced the quadruped option with carrying.
Not sure what can be done about it. Could probably just add options for "duo" and "group".
6_legs and such (there are tags for 1_leg, 2_legs, 3_legs, etc) are actually a part of the multi-leg tag group - characters with more legs than they are supposed to have.
A lot of the posts tagged with 6_legs are in reality just improperly tagged. I personally don't think that tag group should even exist, but I was overruled on that one.
The tags included in this project are for the "natural" number of legs.
This project ends up colliding a lot with solo being improperly tagged.
Are the tags like hexapod preferred over the more common 6_legs, format?
Excellent point, fixed.
The Reclining option is missing the reclining tag itself.
I re-read the all_fours wiki and realized it only said that all_fours didn't need to be tagged on quadrupeds, not that it shouldn't be. So the tagging done by this project isn't problematic, but it was largely unnecessary.
I began this project to fill in tags related to money. I later reused the project to tag missing character genders. I have done my best to restore the original query and tag options. As best I can tell this state represents between 2/3rds and 3/4ths of the changes made under the project.
Please, do not reuse existing projects for a new purpose. This creates confusion in the list of changes, as the list of changes now has one project making different sets of changes.
Fixed the issue with the tag list expanding into eternity.
I could probably add wildcard support to removed tags, so you could just put
*_humanoidin there, and it would remove all tags that match it.Hm. There's so many possible *_humanoid tags to be removed that this project doesn't quite work. Even with just the common ones, the list ends up so long that the image itself is barely visible...
Yeah, taur is extremely rare for pokemon. None of the pokemon are normally taur, but they do occasionally get drawn as taurified. It's so rare that it probably doesn't need a button, but it's good to filter them out.
Which reminds me, there's also the
sphere_creaturecategory, though the only canon pokemon that belong in that body type are Voltorb and Electrode.Done. Don't think that there are too many examples of either, but it wouldn't hurt.
I'd recommend adding the rarer body types added to the search too, '-taur' and '-waddling_head' in particular.